| |
HOME
Who We Are
The E-Board
Contact Us
Benefits
Join UTW
UTW-BLOG
UTW-Archive
In the Press
Medallion Holder
Prop. K
LINKS
Sponsor Page
Older
Issues
'United To Win'
Sping
2008
Winter 2008
Fall 2007
Summer 2007
Sping 2007
Winter 2007
Fall 2006
Summer 2006
Spring 2006
Winter 2006
ALL
ONLINE
ISSUES
REAL
CAB-DRIVERS
ARE
UTW
MEMBER

UTW
needs
Your
Donation
|
 |
TC Recommends
Exemption
From Driving Requirement
For Cab Company Employees
The Taxi Commission
has approved a resolution recommending to the Board of Supervisors an
extremely broad — but less than full — exemption from the
Proposition K driving requirement for permit holders employed by cab
companies in non-driving positions.
A court decision in a case brought by the permit holders’ association
(PDA) authorized the city to “make some limited allowance, consistent
with the strong policy of Proposition K favoring full-time operation
of taxicabs by permit holders, for a permit holder’s leadership
position in a taxicab cooperative” — a so-called “manager’s
exemption.” But the commission’s resolution would allow
the exemption to extend beyond managers to just about any cab company
employee.
These are the resolution’s main provisions:
* A manager is defined as “a color scheme employee whose duties
are integral to the operation of the company.”
* The driving requirement for an exempted permit holder would be reduced
from 800 to 120 hours per year. To qualify, the permit holder would
have to work at least 680 hours per year as a payroll employee working
at the company’s principal place of business.
* Color schemes with at least 10 permits would be allowed a maximum
of one exemption for each 10 permits up to 50 permits. Each additional
25 permits would allow for another exemption.
United Taxicab Workers supports a limited exemption for bona fide company
managers, but opposes the commission’s recommendation as going
way beyond companies’ managerial needs and beyond the authority
granted by the court decision.
Specifically, UTW objects to the overly broad and vague definition of
a manager that would allow virtually any company employee to qualify.
The court decision in S.F. Taxi Permitholders and Drivers Ass’n.
v. City and County of San Francisco clearly intended an allowance limited
to persons in true managerial roles.
UTW also objects to the number of allowed exemptions as far too high.
A company of 50 cabs, which can easily be run by one or two people,
would be allowed five exemptions. Yellow Cab, which has over 400 cabs,
would get more than 20 exemptions, although the company says it employs
only seven managers.
UTW also believes the exemption should only be extended to managers
who work substantially full-time for the company. A part-time manager
can easily fulfill the 800-hour requirement and needs no exemption.
|
 |
|