| |
HOME
Who We Are
The E-Board
Contact Us
Benefits
Join UTW
UTW-BLOG
UTW-Archive
In the Press
Medallion Holder
Prop. K
LINKS
Sponsor Page
Older
Issues
'United To Win'
Sping
2008
Winter 2008
Fall 2007
Summer 2007
Sping 2007
Winter 2007
Fall 2006
Summer 2006
Spring 2006
Winter 2006
ALL
ONLINE
ISSUES
REAL
CAB-DRIVERS
ARE
UTW
MEMBER

UTW
needs
Your
Donation
|
 |
UPDATE:
Ballot Measure Threatens Proposition K
Proposition A, Aimed at Muni Reform,
Contains Taxi Provision in Fine Print
An amendment to
the City Charter on the November ballot could result in the elimination
of our governing taxi law, Proposition K of 1978.
Proposition
A was placed on the ballot in late July by the Board of Supervisors,
under the sponsorship of Supervisor Aaron Peskin. It is intended
to restructure the way Muni operates by placing greater power in
the hands of its regulatory body, the Municipal Transportation Agency,
or MTA.
But one paragraph in this lengthy document could do the trick cab
companies have failed at for almost thirty years – repealing
Prop K of 1978.
Taxi companies and medallion holders have tried eight different
times to repeal or undermine Prop K. The voters have rejected these
attempts each time, most by huge margins. But if Proposition A passes,
the voters may no longer have any say in the matter. |
What
Proposition A Says
About Taxis
“In
order to fully integrate taxi-related functions into the Agency
[should the powers and duties of the Taxi Commission be transferred
to the MTA], the Agency shall have the same exclusive authority
over taxi-related functions and taxi-related fares, fees, charges,
budgets, and personnel that it has over the Municipal Railway
and parking and traffic fares, fees, charges, budgets, and personnel.
Once adopted, Agency regulations shall thereafter supercede
all previously-adopted ordinances governing motor vehicles for
hire that conflict with or duplicate such regulations.”
|
| |
Under the current
Charter, the Board of Supervisors can abolish the Taxi Commission and
transfer its authority to the MTA. If that were to occur, Proposition
K would still govern medallion issuance, and could only be changed by
the voters.
But the broad language of Proposition A’s taxi provision seems
intended to allow the Agency to eliminate Prop K by administrative rule.
(See the text of the new taxi language in the box on the upper right.)
Here are some potential consequences:
· Taxi medallions that now must be issued to cab drivers could
go to cab companies instead.
· Non-transferable medallions, which are issued for the price
of an application fee, could again be bought and sold, as in New York,
where they go for half a million dollars each.
If the MTA takes over taxi regulation under Proposition A, that agency,
rather than the Board of Supervisors, would set taxi gates and meter
rates. To stop a gate or meter increase, the Board of Supervisors would
have to reject the entire MUNI budget by a super-majority of seven votes.
That’s highly improbable. Gate and meter increases will be far
more likely under Proposition A.
The taxi provisions were inserted in Proposition A behind the backs
of cab drivers and the Taxi Commission itself. There was no notification
or opportunity for public discussion or hearings on this obscure provision
in a 39-page document. United Taxicab Workers only learned of the taxi
provision after the measure had been placed on the ballot.
UTW is fighting Proposition A. Drivers who would like to
help in the campaign should call our office at 864-8294.
The following
is UTW's official ballot argument:
TAXI
PROVISION POISONS PROP A
One paragraph
in this thick document, Proposition A, contains Yellow Cab's dream come
true. But it's a nightmare for cab drivers, passengers, and voters.
A single paragraph could repeal Prop K and destroy a power that voters
have held for almost thirty years: Voters control our city’s taxi
permits. Cab companies and medallion holders have tried eight times
to repeal or undermine Prop K. Voters have rejected these attempts,
resoundingly. But under Proposition A, if the Board of Supervisors transfers
taxi regulation from the Taxi Commission to the MTA, the Agency could
repeal Prop K by an administrative rule. Here are some potential consequences:
· Taxi permits (medallions) that now must be issued to cab drivers
could go to cab companies instead.
· Non-transferable medallions, which are issued for the price
of an application fee, could again be bought and sold, as in New York,
where they fetch half a million dollars each.
· Also, WATCH YOUR POCKETS! The MTA itself, and not our elected
officials, could set meter rates, under a mandate to "develop new
sources of funding for the Agency's operations." To stop a fare
increase, the Board of Supervisors would have to reject the entire MUNI
budget by a super-majority of seven votes! Fat chance. Expect a taxi
fare increase if Prop A passes.
The taxi provision was inserted in Proposition A behind the backs of
cab drivers and the Taxi Commission itself. No outreach, no consultation,
not a word to the thousands who would be most affected by the potentially
devastating changes it could bring about. As long-time supporters of
transit-first and clean-air policies, we've been betrayed. Please send
this back to the drawing board. Vote NO on A.
United
Taxicab Workers
In the Press:
SF
cabbies criticize transit measure
Examiner.com - USA 08.27.2007
SAN FRANCISCO - A November ballot measure that could give the city's
transportation agency authority to regulate the taxicab industry has
riled ...
click
here to read this article
|
 |
|